Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 12 - Jul 17
Promo Codes Available:
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
1970-1972 Challenger Pro+ Brake System Front 4141039CYFits 1970 72 Mopar E Body (Challenger Barracuda) w OE 2 Piston Disc Brake Spindle Features: 2 Piece, 6 Piston, 6P Caliper Manufactured in Phoenix, AZ CNC Machined from US Sourced Forged or Billet Aluminum Powder Coated Finish Stainless Steel Pistons, Abutments and Noise Suppression Clips Staggered Pistons to Minimize Uneven Pad Wear Dual Seals, Dust Weather & Pressure 2 Piece Slot, Drilled, Zinc Plate Rotor w Billet Aluminum Hat Specs: Applications
Fits 1970-72 Mopar E-Body (Challenger/Barracuda) w/OE 2-Piston Disc Brake Spindle
Features:
- 2-Piece, 6-Piston, 6P Caliper Manufactured in Phoenix, AZ
- CNC Machined from US Sourced Forged or Billet Aluminum
- Powder Coated Finish
- Stainless Steel Pistons, Abutments and Noise Suppression Clips
- Staggered Pistons to Minimize Uneven Pad Wear
- Dual Seals, Dust/Weather & Pressure
- 2-Piece Slot, Drilled, Zinc-Plate Rotor w/Billet Aluminum Hat
Specs:
| Applications | Mopar E-Body 70-72 |
|---|---|
| Axle | Front |
| Brand | Baer Brakes |
| Caliper | 6P |
| Caliper Color | Comp Yellow |
| Disc Brake Caliper (Front) Piston Quantity | 6 |
| Disc Brake Caliper (Front) Type | Fixed |
| Disc Brake Pad FMSI Number | D0731 |
| Disc Brake Rotor (Front) Construction | Vented |
| Disc Brake Rotor (Front) Outside Diameter | 13.000IN |
| Emission Code | 6 |
| Export Description | Brake Components |
| Fitment Notes | w/OE 2-Piston Disc Brake Spindle |
| Grade Type | Performance |
| Hose Material | Stainless Steel |
| Lug Count | 5 Lug |
| Min Wheel Dia (verify using template) | 17IN |
| Product Line | 13 Inch Pro+ |
| Product Type | 13 Inch Pro+ Front Brake Kit |
| Prop 65 (C, R or CR) | CR |
| Prop 65 - Long Label | WARNING: This product can expose you to chemicals including Toluene Diisocyanate, and Nickel which are known to the State of California to cause cancer. For more information, visit www.P65Warnings.ca.gov |
| Prop 65 Yes/No | Yes |
| Rotor Thickness | 1.100IN |
| Rotor Type | 2-Piece |
| Spindle Type | Mopar E-Body 2-Piston Disc (1970-72) |
| Spindles Included | No |
| Surface Type | Slotted, Drilled & Zinc Plated |
| System Notes | Designed to be used with 70-72 Mopar E-Body 2-piston disc brake spindles, will fit 1966-72 B-Body w/70-72 2-piston disc brake spindle upgrade |
| Template | Q082H |
| Title | Pro+ Brake System Front |
| Wheel Lug/Bolt Pattern | 5x4.50 |
| Wheel Stud Size | 1/2-20" x 2.25" |
Application:
| Year | Make | Model | Submodel |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1970-1972 | Dodge | Challenger | |
| 1970-1972 | Plymouth | Barracuda |
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.3 ★★★★★
Based on 1538 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 5
Great balls
So far so good. Belgian/pyrenees mix that loves chewing and destroying toys. He’ll have a hard time destroying these. They are light but carry well once thrown outside. Being light they are good inside on very cold days compared to something like a lacrosse ball. Better than Chuck It brand.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 7, 2026
★★★★★ 5
NICE for soups!
Style: 34 Ounces, Size: 34 Count
We try to keep these in the house. They are REALLY nicely sized and work great for soups. They are AWESOME for soups and the only disposable plates I feel comfy using for large stews and such. Makes cleaning easy because I don't HAVE TO CLEAN! They are a bit more expensive than otherd disposable plates, but they are worth it. Pretty heavy duty plates that are thick and great for heavier foods. <3
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 18, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Favorite compostable plates ever!
Style: 34 Ounces, Size: 34 Count, Style: 34 Ounces, Size: 34 Count
I’ve been using the Dixie Ultra Extra Large Compostable Paper Bowls, and I can honestly say I absolutely love them! They’re sturdy, deep, and hold generous portions, perfect for everything from hearty soups and pasta to big salads or even snacks for movie night. Unlike other paper bowls, they don’t get soggy or collapse, even with hot or liquid-heavy foods. Another huge plus for me is that they’re compostable, so I can enjoy the convenience of disposables without the guilt. They’re strong, reliable, and environmentally friendly, which is a rare combo! If you’re looking for durable, eco-conscious paper bowls that can handle anything you throw in them, these are a must-have. Highly recommend!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on June 1, 2025
★★★★★ 5
No more washing pozole/menudo bowls for me
Style: 34 Ounces, Size: 34 Count
Very sturdy for a paper plate. Used these for pozole at a party and saved me the hassle of washing plates. Good size, bigger than you think. When serving it does get hot so use something underneath so you don’t get burned.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 26, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Extra large paper bowls are sturdy, affordable, and make clean up a breeze.
Style: 34 Ounces, Size: 34 Count
I like the convenience of paper plates and these large 34 oz. bowls are perfect for microwave cooking. They are deep enough to handle soup, pasta, stuffing and vegetable sides with no problems and without any leaking, and are a good value for the price. They look stylish and make clean up less of a chore. You can't go wrong with Dixie paper products. They're sturdy, fun, and last through the meal.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 30, 2026